Northern District Logo
United States District Court
Northern District of Illinois
Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, Chief Judge | Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court
close
Home > Judges >
Judge Information
Judge Matthew F. Kennelly
meeting_room Courtroom: 2103 gavel Chambers: 2188 phone Telephone: (312) 435-5618 fax Fax: (312) 554-8678
error
Important Information

Motions: Under General Order 20-0012, as amended, the local rule requiring motions to be noticed for presentment in court has been suspended. Motions should not be noticed for hearing but instead should simply be filed. If a motion has not been addressed by either a ruling or the setting of a briefing schedule within a reasonable time after filing of the motion, counsel may call Judge Kennelly's courtroom deputy clerk to inquire.

Courtesy copies: Under General Order 20-0012, as amended, courtesy copies need not be submitted. If a courtesy copy is needed, such as for a very large filing, Judge Kennelly's chambers will contact counsel to request one. If a courtesy copy is requested, it should be spiral bound on the side, and any exhibits should be tabbed.

Procedures to be followed in cases assigned to Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Motion Call: In-court motion hearings have been suspended by General Order 20-0012, as amended. Motions are not to be noticed for presentment in court. If a hearing is required on a motion, the court will set it, and it will be conducted by telephone or video conference. In-person hearings are limited to matters that, by law, must be conducted in person.

Status Call: In-court status hearings have been suspended by General Order 20-0012, as amended. Status hearings will be conducted by telephone conference.

Motion Call: In-court motion hearings have been suspended by General Order 20-0012, as amended. Motions are not to be noticed for presentment in court. If a hearing is required on a motion, the court will set it, and it will be conducted by telephone or video conference. In-person hearings are limited to matters that, by law, must be conducted in person.

Status Call: In-court status hearings have been suspended by General Order 20-0012, as amended. Status hearings will be conducted by telephone conference.

Judge Kennelly will set all newly-filed cases for an initial case management conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) approximately 60 days of the filing of the complaint. At the initial conference, the parties should be prepared to discuss the nature of the case, report on the possibility of settlement, and discuss the nature and length of discovery necessary to prepare the case for trial. A discovery cut-off date may be set at the initial conference.

In some cases, the scheduled status conference may take place before a defendant has responded to the plaintiff’s complaint. Judge Kennelly expects all defendants who have been served with process to participate in this conference even if they have not yet responded to the complaint.

Judge Kennelly will set all newly-filed cases for an initial case management conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) approximately 60 days of the filing of the complaint. At the initial conference, the parties should be prepared to discuss the nature of the case, report on the possibility of settlement, and discuss the nature and length of discovery necessary to prepare the case for trial. A discovery cut-off date may be set at the initial conference.

In some cases, the scheduled status conference may take place before a defendant has responded to the plaintiff’s complaint. Judge Kennelly expects all defendants who have been served with process to participate in this conference even if they have not yet responded to the complaint.

In-court motion hearings have been suspended by General Order 20-0012, as amended. Motions are not to be noticed for presentment in court. If a hearing is required on a motion, the court will set it, and it will be conducted by telephone or video conference. In-person hearings are limited to matters that, by law, must be conducted in person.

Joint, uncontested, and agreed motions should be so identified in the title and the body of a motion.

If a motion has not been addressed by either a ruling or the setting of a briefing schedule within a reasonable time after filing of the motion, counsel may call Judge Kennelly's courtroom deputy clerk to inquire.

Under General Order 20-0012, as amended, courtesy copies need not be submitted. If a courtesy copy is needed, such as for a very large filing, Judge Kennelly's chambers will contact counsel to request one. If a courtesy copy is requested, it should be spiral bound on the side, and any exhibits should be tabbed.

In-court motion hearings have been suspended by General Order 20-0012, as amended. Motions are not to be noticed for presentment in court. If a hearing is required on a motion, the court will set it, and it will be conducted by telephone or video conference. In-person hearings are limited to matters that, by law, must be conducted in person.

Joint, uncontested, and agreed motions should be so identified in the title and the body of a motion.

If a motion has not been addressed by either a ruling or the setting of a briefing schedule within a reasonable time after filing of the motion, counsel may call Judge Kennelly's courtroom deputy clerk to inquire.

Under General Order 20-0012, as amended, courtesy copies need not be submitted. If a courtesy copy is needed, such as for a very large filing, Judge Kennelly's chambers will contact counsel to request one. If a courtesy copy is requested, it should be spiral bound on the side, and any exhibits should be tabbed.

Judge Kennelly believes that parties can and should work out most discovery disputes and thus discourages the filing of discovery motions. Judge Kennelly will not hear or consider any discovery motion unless the movant has complied with the "meet and confer" requirement of Local Rule 37.2 . The motion must state with specificity when and how the movant complied with Local Rule 37.2. Parties are reminded that compliance with Local Rule 37.2 requires a good faith effort to resolve discovery disputes and communication that takes place face to face or by telephone. The exchange of correspondence ordinarily will not be sufficient to comply with Local Rule 37.2.

Judge Kennelly will only rarely set briefing schedules on discovery motions. His more common practice is to address the motion at an upcoming status hearing or separately set it for a hearing, at which all parties should be fully prepared to argue the motion. If a briefing schedule is set on a discovery motion, it typically will be expedited so that the motion can be resolved promptly.

Parties are reminded that there is no "sequence" in which discovery must occur, and that one party’s failure or inability to respond to discovery will not excuse any other party’s prompt compliance.

The pendency of a motion, such as a motion to dismiss, does not operate as a stay of discovery. Discovery is not stayed unless the court orders it to be stayed.

Judge Kennelly believes that parties can and should work out most discovery disputes and thus discourages the filing of discovery motions. Judge Kennelly will not hear or consider any discovery motion unless the movant has complied with the "meet and confer" requirement of Local Rule 37.2 . The motion must state with specificity when and how the movant complied with Local Rule 37.2. Parties are reminded that compliance with Local Rule 37.2 requires a good faith effort to resolve discovery disputes and communication that takes place face to face or by telephone. The exchange of correspondence ordinarily will not be sufficient to comply with Local Rule 37.2.

Judge Kennelly will only rarely set briefing schedules on discovery motions. His more common practice is to address the motion at an upcoming status hearing or separately set it for a hearing, at which all parties should be fully prepared to argue the motion. If a briefing schedule is set on a discovery motion, it typically will be expedited so that the motion can be resolved promptly.

Parties are reminded that there is no "sequence" in which discovery must occur, and that one party’s failure or inability to respond to discovery will not excuse any other party’s prompt compliance.

The pendency of a motion, such as a motion to dismiss, does not operate as a stay of discovery. Discovery is not stayed unless the court orders it to be stayed.

For most motions, a separate draft order is not needed, and a minute entry by the clerk will suffice. In cases in which a written order is needed, rather than or in addition to a minute entry, Judge Kennelly requests that the draft order be submitted electronically to his proposed order e-mail address. Some examples of situations where a written order should be submitted are: protective orders; HIPAA confidentiality orders; temporary restraining orders; preliminary injunctions; orders of default that require the defaulting party to take specific action; orders preliminarily or finally approving class action or collective action settlements; etc. These can and should be submitted at the time the motion is filed. Situations where a written order should not be submitted, unless specifically requested by the court, are: extensions of time; expansions of page limits; motions to compel or prevent discovery; adding or withdrawing appearances of counsel; etc.

When a draft order is submitted, it is to be attached to an e-mail sent to the following e-mail address: Proposed_Order_Kennelly@ilnd.uscourts.gov . The subject line of the e-mail must include the case number and name, the docket number of the corresponding motion, if any, and the title of the order that is proposed as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All such documents must be submitted in Microsoft Word format. All other parties to the case must be copied on the email.

For most motions, a separate draft order is not needed, and a minute entry by the clerk will suffice. In cases in which a written order is needed, rather than or in addition to a minute entry, Judge Kennelly requests that the draft order be submitted electronically to his proposed order e-mail address. Some examples of situations where a written order should be submitted are: protective orders; HIPAA confidentiality orders; temporary restraining orders; preliminary injunctions; orders of default that require the defaulting party to take specific action; orders preliminarily or finally approving class action or collective action settlements; etc. These can and should be submitted at the time the motion is filed. Situations where a written order should not be submitted, unless specifically requested by the court, are: extensions of time; expansions of page limits; motions to compel or prevent discovery; adding or withdrawing appearances of counsel; etc.

When a draft order is submitted, it is to be attached to an e-mail sent to the following e-mail address: Proposed_Order_Kennelly@ilnd.uscourts.gov . The subject line of the e-mail must include the case number and name, the docket number of the corresponding motion, if any, and the title of the order that is proposed as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All such documents must be submitted in Microsoft Word format. All other parties to the case must be copied on the email.

Any party moving for entry of a protective order by Judge Kennelly pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) must abide by the following guidelines.

Judge Kennelly will not sign a protective order that allows counsel, in their discretion, to decide which matters are to be deemed confidential. The proposed order must specify the categories of documents or other matters which may be subject to the order (e.g., personnel files, medical information, confidential financial matters, etc.). The motion for protective order must set forth why confidentiality is necessary as to each such category.

Judge Kennelly will not sign a protective order that provides that items designated by a party as confidential may, for that reason, be filed with the court under seal. Rather, any protective order that contemplates under-seal filing must provide that no documents may be filed under seal absent a motion, filed and noticed for hearing prior to the due date of the particular filing, showing good cause for sealing a portion of the record in the case. The mere fact that information has been designated as confidential by a party is insufficient to permit under-seal filing. A party seeking to file material under seal must set forth in its motion the reasons why the record should be sealed.

Issuance of a protective order will not be given binding effect as a determination of good cause for Rule 26(c) purposes if, at any future time, a party moves for relief from the protective order's limitations. If such a motion is made, the court will engage in an appropriate balancing of the interests between privacy and public access to make a new determination of good cause in light of the facts then before the court.

In any case in which Judge Kennelly permits filing under seal, an unredacted version of the entire filing, including all exhibits, must be filed under seal, and a redacted version that omits the sealed portions must be filed in the public record.

Any party moving for entry of a protective order by Judge Kennelly pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) must abide by the following guidelines.

Judge Kennelly will not sign a protective order that allows counsel, in their discretion, to decide which matters are to be deemed confidential. The proposed order must specify the categories of documents or other matters which may be subject to the order (e.g., personnel files, medical information, confidential financial matters, etc.). The motion for protective order must set forth why confidentiality is necessary as to each such category.

Judge Kennelly will not sign a protective order that provides that items designated by a party as confidential may, for that reason, be filed with the court under seal. Rather, any protective order that contemplates under-seal filing must provide that no documents may be filed under seal absent a motion, filed and noticed for hearing prior to the due date of the particular filing, showing good cause for sealing a portion of the record in the case. The mere fact that information has been designated as confidential by a party is insufficient to permit under-seal filing. A party seeking to file material under seal must set forth in its motion the reasons why the record should be sealed.

Issuance of a protective order will not be given binding effect as a determination of good cause for Rule 26(c) purposes if, at any future time, a party moves for relief from the protective order's limitations. If such a motion is made, the court will engage in an appropriate balancing of the interests between privacy and public access to make a new determination of good cause in light of the facts then before the court.

In any case in which Judge Kennelly permits filing under seal, an unredacted version of the entire filing, including all exhibits, must be filed under seal, and a redacted version that omits the sealed portions must be filed in the public record.

Judge Kennelly disfavors motions to strike all or portions of an opposing party's Local Rule 56.1 submission. Under ordinary circumstances, if a party contends that its opponent has included inadmissible evidence, improper argument, or other objectionable material in a Rule 56.1 submission, the party's argument that the offending material should not be considered should be included in its response or reply brief, not in a separate motion to strike.

Judge Kennelly disfavors motions to strike all or portions of an opposing party's Local Rule 56.1 submission. Under ordinary circumstances, if a party contends that its opponent has included inadmissible evidence, improper argument, or other objectionable material in a Rule 56.1 submission, the party's argument that the offending material should not be considered should be included in its response or reply brief, not in a separate motion to strike.

Instructions for settlement conferences for cases assigned to Judge Kennelly.

Instructions for settlement conferences for cases assigned to Judge Kennelly.

Judge Kennelly’s requirements for the filing of final pretrial orders differ somewhat from those imposed by Local Rule 16.1.

Parties should consult Judge Kennelly’s Final Pretrial Order requirements.

Judge Kennelly’s requirements for the filing of final pretrial orders differ somewhat from those imposed by Local Rule 16.1.

Parties should consult Judge Kennelly’s Final Pretrial Order requirements.

Judge Kennelly typically selects twelve jurors in civil cases. However, as a result of space limitations resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, civil juries will be limited to eight jurors until further notice.

Judge Kennelly's Jury Selection Procedure

Judge Kennelly typically selects twelve jurors in civil cases. However, as a result of space limitations resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, civil juries will be limited to eight jurors until further notice.

Judge Kennelly's Jury Selection Procedure

Pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 41, Judge Kennelly has issued a standing order that any and all search warrants or seizure warrants related to a criminal case assigned to Judge Kennelly are to be brought to Judge Kennelly for consideration, not to the duty magistrate judge, the designated magistrate judge, or the emergency judge. Pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 41, Judge Kennelly has issued a standing order that any and all search warrants or seizure warrants related to a criminal case assigned to Judge Kennelly are to be brought to Judge Kennelly for consideration, not to the duty magistrate judge, the designated magistrate judge, or the emergency judge.
Select a date below to view all schedules.
Monday, December 9, 2024
11 cases
expand_more
Tuesday, December 10, 2024
8 cases
expand_more
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
7 cases
expand_more
Number of days notice: 3
Motion Type Day Time
Civ. & Crim. Tu, W, Th 9:30 a.m.
Court Reporter
Carolyn Cox
(312) 435-5639
Room 2102
Courtroom Deputy
Melissa Astell
Melissa_Astell@ilnd.uscourts.gov
(312) 435-5350
Room 2106
Law Clerks
Shafeen Pittal
Scott Shimizu
Bess Hanish